I'm not sure how I feel about this. In a case like this I don't see how ALL evidence doesn't apply to the case. No pictures of the gunshot wounds, until they were discovered later by a very truthful physician who wasn't sure how accurate her previous testimony was. How is it that no one bothered to ask the physician if any pictures were taken of the patients after the shooting? What about pictures of the scene? Anyone can see the blood in the driveway, and what about the spent cases? If you combine the gunshot wound pictures with the evidence in the driveway, I don't see how you can't KNOW how things took place.
I do understand how hard it must be for some people to get past shooting 2 unarmed assailants (one of which was a woman), but come on it was obvious that they were lying. That would lead anyone with a logical mind to ask "Why are they lying? What are they trying to hide?".
I agree about the situation changing when the man joined the two women and started his assault on the victim. At that point I would have done the same thing and pulled my gun to defend myself and my family before I was down for the count.
This just goes to show how the system can let you down.
In the end, I'm just glad I live in Texas...
