TexasCHLforum.com

Now, go after the big fish.

mojo84 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 05, 2018 10:13 am Any question it is 100% political?

Absolutely no doubt. This whole fiasco is also more proof that the 17th Amendment was, and continues to be, the biggest mistake ever.

mojo84 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 4:28 pm This lady nails it. Umm hoping there are a lot more like her.

http://facebook.com/groups/194535687881 ... 1181814445

I keep getting an error. I don''t have FB.

bblhd672 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:54 pm Flake flakes out at last minute. Big surprise. How could there be an FBI investigation of something with no evidence?

Delay, delay, delay, all the way till November 6.

He did?

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/28/politics ... index.html

Breaking: Senate Will Move Ahead With Planned Floor Vote on Kavanaugh

Senate Republicans confirmed Thursday evening that they will be moving ahead with a committee vote and then a floor vote on Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) told reporters that the Senate Judiciary Committee plans to hold a vote on Friday morning. The full Senate will then hold an initial procedural vote Monday and the final vote on his nomination will likely take place Tuesday.

Duplicate

BBYC wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:32 pm

Pawpaw wrote: ↑Tue Sep 25, 2018 6:04 pm

BBYC wrote: ↑Tue Sep 25, 2018 12:38 pm If the Republicans refuse to stand up to bullies, why should we vote for them?

Because a vote for anyone else is a vote for the bullies.

You have that backwards. Voting for somebody who aids and abets a bully is like voting for the bully herself.

Go ahead and vote for the status quo if you want. You may fool yourself but don't expect woke normals to see a pro-swamp vote as anything other than a pro-swamp vote. .

You're the one that has it backwards.

We've all heard, or at least read about, the lunatic ravings of the Dimocraps... including many who already hold office.

They abhor the Second Amendment, so it's got to go. Free speech only applies if the speech is something they agree with, so everything else must be banned as "hate speech". Religion is hatred and racism incarnate, so there goes the First Amendment. ...And the list goes on.

Republicans do a lot of things I don't agree with, but they're the best defense we have against the Socialism which the left wants to ram down our throats.

The simple reality is that, at least for now, have a two-party system. That means that it's all a numbers game. Whichever of those two parties gets the most votes wins. If you don't add a vote to the side that best supports your views, then you weaken that side. This is almost the equivalent to a gain for the other side.

As the great parliamentarian Edmund Burke said, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”

It's very unlikely that any of us will ever see a politician we agree with 100% of the time. Holding out for that is a fools errand.

BBYC wrote: ↑Tue Sep 25, 2018 12:38 pm If the Republicans refuse to stand up to bullies, why should we vote for them?

Because a vote for anyone else is a vote for the bullies.

Democrats Don't Fear Brett Kavanaugh; They Fear The Constitution

Sure, some of the anger aimed at Donald Trump's nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court is partisan bluster meant to placate the activist base. Still, most Democrats were going to get hysterical about any pick, because any conservative pick was going to take the Constitution far too literally for their liking. For those who rely on the administrative state and coercion as a policy tool -- forcing people to join political organizations, forcing them to support abortion, forcing them to subsidize socially progressive sacraments, forcing them to create products that undermine their faith, and so on -- that's a big problem.

RHenriksen wrote: ↑Wed Jun 27, 2018 10:50 pm How about Trey Gowdy for SCOTUS?

Half of the Dimocrap Senators would stroke out.

I'm not seeing a downside.