![Image](https://bearingarms.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/chicago.jpg)
Search found 4 matches
Return to “ACLU Issues Texas ‘Travel Advisory’”
- Thu May 11, 2017 8:59 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: ACLU Issues Texas ‘Travel Advisory’
- Replies: 38
- Views: 9343
- Wed May 10, 2017 1:50 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: ACLU Issues Texas ‘Travel Advisory’
- Replies: 38
- Views: 9343
Re: ACLU Issues Texas ‘Travel Advisory’
Ignore this. I just deleted a duplicate post.
- Wed May 10, 2017 1:49 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: ACLU Issues Texas ‘Travel Advisory’
- Replies: 38
- Views: 9343
Re: ACLU Issues Texas ‘Travel Advisory’
Not too long ago, they were officially known as "illegal aliens". I still think that title is true and correct.Flightmare wrote:I've always used the term "National Trespassers". They are trespassing on our nation.
There's a big difference between an immigrant and an illegal alien. They may come from the same country, but one did it legally and the other is a criminal.
- Wed May 10, 2017 9:51 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: ACLU Issues Texas ‘Travel Advisory’
- Replies: 38
- Views: 9343
Re: ACLU Issues Texas ‘Travel Advisory’
The ACLU's stance on the 2nd Amendment is published here: https://www.aclu.org/other/second-amendment
The heart of it is here:
The heart of it is here:
Yea... They're protecting the Bill of Rights...............................................NOT!!!The ACLU wrote:ACLU Position
Given the reference to "a well regulated Militia" and "the security of a free State," the ACLU has long taken the position that the Second Amendment protects a collective right rather than an individual right. For seven decades, the Supreme Court's 1939 decision in United States v. Miller was widely understood to have endorsed that view. This position is currently under review and is being updated by the ACLU National Board in light of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in D.C. v. Heller in 2008.
In striking down Washington D.C.'s handgun ban by a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court's decision in D.C. v. Heller held for the first time that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms, whether or not associated with a state militia. The ACLU disagrees with the Supreme Court's conclusion about the nature of the right protected by the Second Amendment. However, particular federal or state laws on licensing, registration, prohibition, or other regulation of the manufacture, shipment, sale, purchase or possession of guns may raise civil liberties questions.