It would be an add-on charge that would hopefully increase the criminal's vacation in the greybar hotel.clarionite wrote:MeMelYup wrote:Instead of outlawing type 3 body armour they should provide a penalty for using it while committing a crime.Wasn't there a penalty for the original crime? It apparently didn't stop them from committing that crime.
I don't see the logic. It should be mandated that a criminal make it easier for himself to be killed if he fails to obey the law?
To me that makes about as much sense as thinking that a criminal will avoid carrying a firearm into a gun free zone because of the penalty for breaking that law, when they're going to commit a crime that has a penalty of 25 to life... or the death penalty.
Search found 1 match
Return to “House Bill to Ban Body Armor for us peasants”
- Thu Feb 05, 2015 11:48 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: House Bill to Ban Body Armor for us peasants
- Replies: 27
- Views: 2791