TexasCHLforum.com

The Annoyed Man wrote:

The_Busy_Mom wrote:As for Final Shot, we will not be selling anything to California until some things drastically change. I have a hard time withholding sales to those in California who really need to protect themselves, but this is out of control, and affects the potential livelihood for my family. Potential because I will loose potential sales, but because I also pick up potential risk when I transfer/ship/sell firearms to anyone in CA. And the sheeple over there don't know any better what the new laws, and how said new laws should affect their firearms purchases. This is especially inherent with the proliferation of online sales. No sir, no more California sales.

TBM

It doesn't affect me....or it does in a small way....but I wouldn't sell grapefruit to California. OTH, I do have a client in California.

The Annoyed Man wrote:

baldeagle wrote:

JALLEN wrote:I agree with Ronnie Barrett. Get it to the point that the government can not purchase or service their weapons, so they have to use slingshots like Tijuana issued to their police some years ago.

Get those dangerous weapons off the street.

To the point of this microstamping, it is idiotic in the extreme. All you have to do to ruin a crime scene is drop rounds of similar caliber you picked up at the local range, fired by half a dozen or more guns, an evidentiary pig's breakfast.

Better yet, police your own brass and drop somebody else's. Voila! You're not a suspect and an innocent person has a lot of explaining to do. Sneak into the police firing range at night and pick up a bunch of brass, and you can really drive the forensics people nuts.

Politicians should have to pass a subject matter test before they get to vote.

Far easier and requires less thought during the post-crime escape/evasion: remove the microstamping from your gun. End of problem.