TexasCHLforum.com

Katygunnut wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

zero4o3 wrote:

AustinMRH wrote:I have carried at work IWB using my 239 and a Comp Tac Spartan. Works well. Now I've switched to a briefcase with a hidden pocket and a .38 revolver. I'm at my desk almost all the time so on the body is not as important.

I have shot plenty of other 9mm handguns and I think my 239 is the best shooting of them. Though I've got a date with a Wilson soon. The thickness of the 239 is fantastic for a 9 you could shoot all day. If I wanted another option though I would seriously consider the 238.

I was thinking the same thing, to me the 239 is a good bit smaller then the glocks in thickness, which is what made me choose it.

I thought the same thing and looked up the widths of a G19 and a P239. The G19 shows to be 1.18 and the P239 is 1.2... . I would have sworn the Glock was wider.

The Glock is also slimmer than a 1911 (1911 is 1.28 inches). That said, the 1911 feels a heck of alot slimmer than my Glocks. Something about the design of the Glock makes them feel fatter than they actually are.

AustinMRH wrote:I have carried at work IWB using my 239 and a Comp Tac Spartan. Works well. Now I've switched to a briefcase with a hidden pocket and a .38 revolver. I'm at my desk almost all the time so on the body is not as important.

I have shot plenty of other 9mm handguns and I think my 239 is the best shooting of them. Though I've got a date with a Wilson soon. The thickness of the 239 is fantastic for a 9 you could shoot all day. If I wanted another option though I would seriously consider the 238.