Search found 2 matches

by canvasbck
Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:59 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: Hearing Protection Act of 2017
Replies: 148
Views: 50400

Re: Hearing Protection Act of 2017

anygunanywhere wrote:
MeMelYup wrote:
ScottDLS wrote:What we really need is a Federal law banning and confiscating autoloader rifles that are not equipped with a rate of fire slowing device (ROFSD), that keeps you from pulling the trigger more than once every two seconds. All existing semi-rifles must be registered IAW NFA after having ROFSD installed. And if you are discovered pulling the trigger of your semi-auto more than once per 2 seconds you will be guilty, you lose your gun and are guilty of a felony. Most responsible ranges already prohibit rapid fire, so this is a simple, common sense, gun law that even the NRA should be able to get behind.

And why does anyone need drum magazines that hold 50 or 100 deadly bullets? These are unnecessary and illegal for deer hunting so they should be banned.
A guy and several of his buddies brake into your house wanting anything they can get. Do you want a firearm that will shoot only once every two seconds, or one that will shoot every time you pull the trigger no mater how fast? Would you rather have a five round magazine, or a thirty or sixty? Would you rather have a silencer on your firearm, or a loud ringing in your ears that gets more intense each time you pull the trigger? Not saying the silencer would knockout the noise and ringing, but it would not be as intense, especially with an SRB.
ScottDLS was being sarcastic.
Sadly, it's difficult to tell the difference between sarcasm and the things that the left actually support.
by canvasbck
Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:34 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: Hearing Protection Act of 2017
Replies: 148
Views: 50400

Re: Hearing Protection Act of 2017

Admittedly, I surround myself with a lot of like minded individuals. I was having a hard time coming up with arguments that the left could make AGAINST this bill. Suppressors do not make firearms any more or less efficient in the context of being killing machines. As someone with firearm related hearing loss, I couldn't think of a single reason why suppressors should be as restricted as they currently are. So, I went out and looked for articles arguing against this bill. Here's what I found (WARNING, some of these articles may cause permanent IQ loss):

http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik ... story.html

http://lawnewz.com/opinion/gop-introduc ... n-law-yet/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/gu ... 0d6cddae90

Remember some of the excrement in these arguments the next time you hear a lefty say the words "common sense compromises on gun violence" :banghead:

Return to “Hearing Protection Act of 2017”