Search found 1 match

by canvasbck
Wed Feb 27, 2013 8:55 pm
Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: Looking for Common Mans Analysis
Replies: 39
Views: 6715

Re: Looking for Common Mans Analysis

WhiteFeather wrote:For give me ..... I've kinda been poring over this legalese for weeks. What are the realistic outcomes of the OC bills in plain speak. What's the hubbub about the 30.06 signs as being game changers :roll: if they have 'em up and I don't agree I'll just go somewhere else .... easy.

Please, don't flog me ....... Learned, opinions wanted :txflag:
OK, I'm going to give you two scenarios below, from the vantage point of a pro 2A business that also relies on not so friendly clients to keep his/her business profitable. Let me know which one expands our rights from where they stand today and which one restricts our rights.

1) OC passes and 30.06 is amended to include OC and CC. People start carrying into the business and customers start complaining. The owner is now faced with either putting up a sign to retain the 10% of his customers who are complaining or not put up the sign and retain the 5% of his customers who are OCing. Financial situations dictate that the signs must go up to protect his business and no kind of carry is allowed in the business.

2) OC passes without amending 30.06 and any "gunbuster" sign applies to OC while 30.06 compliant signs are required to prohibit CC. People start carrying into the business and customers start complaining. The owner reluctantly puts up a gunbuster sign, knowing full well that people will still be carrying, but he will not lose his nervous nelly customers. CHL holders notice the sign, untuck their shirt and cover up their carry gun before proceeding inside.

Return to “Looking for Common Mans Analysis”