Would you accept it if the Washington Post reported it? http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the ... -save-him/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;mojo84 wrote:So you are OK with your disdain clouding your judgment? Like I said, the support and data provided does not support your assertion that the money came from Cornyn or "Cornyn's PAC". Him being a " rino" doesn't prove your point either.bi wasn't looking for "loopholes" was just trying to verify what the article and you were saying and I couldn't.
I don't think you can prove it was Cornyn or "Cornyn's PAC" because if you could, you would have.
Hopefully others don't just assume what they read on the interwebs as being true.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ ... story.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Maybe Breitbart is too right wing for you? http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government ... Fundraiser" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government ... Fundraiser" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This one claims Cornyn gave $15,000 http://www.senateconservatives.com/site ... e-enablers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Here's the NY Times reporting on the money but not who gave it http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/17/upsho ... .html?_r=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Here's the question you need to ask yourself. Why should sitting Senators take a position in a primary race? Shouldn't they let the Republican voters of that state decide who they want to represent them? And why is it OK for US Senators to pay for race-baiting ads to defeat an incumbent's challenger?