I'm having trouble wrapping my head around this. If women shouldn't have to defend themselves, then, logically, the only ones who can is men. Yet feminists claim they don't need men. It's a real head scratcher.VMI77 wrote:In fact, women who do defend themselves are apparently an affront to feminists.
http://gunssavelives.net/blog/miss-neva ... f-defense/
Miss USA shouldn't be telling women to learn how to defend themselves according to "progressive" utopianists.
Women Should not have to defend themselves…. Men need education.People who are this delusional are simply incapable of rational thought. These mental cases not only don't want women to have guns, they don't even want them to fight off an attacker by any means. Well, if someone tries to rape my wife, they're going to get shot.Let's hope Nevada uses her media tour to reiterate that teaching girls self defense is NOT the best way to protect against assault
OTOH, if what they're saying is that there shouldn't be any violence in the world, they demonstrate a naivete that forces one to the conclusion that without men around to protect them they are sitting ducks. Yet they claim they are just as capable as men, which means they should be able to defend themselves and not need anyone else to do it. Another headscratcher.
Logic, apparently, is not their long suit.