Is it safe to assume that because you haven't answered you don't have an answer?baldeagle wrote:Really? Who did they call?cb1000rider wrote:Perry misspeaks a bit more than usual for a politician. I see no in calling him out on a simple mistake. He got the country wrong, but you know what event he's speaking of.
I'd call him out on the facts around what he is speaking about.... He indicated that the Obama administration didn't make a phone call to address the attack on the embassy. Based on the testimony that I've read, that's simply not true... They did it wrong in a bunch of other ways, but indicating that they wouldn't pick up the phone isn't reality.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Wasn't that on Reagan's watch?”
- Thu Jul 04, 2013 9:37 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Wasn't that on Reagan's watch?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2244
Re: Wasn't that on Reagan's watch?
- Thu Jul 04, 2013 3:49 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Wasn't that on Reagan's watch?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2244
Re: Wasn't that on Reagan's watch?
Really? Who did they call?cb1000rider wrote:Perry misspeaks a bit more than usual for a politician. I see no in calling him out on a simple mistake. He got the country wrong, but you know what event he's speaking of.
I'd call him out on the facts around what he is speaking about.... He indicated that the Obama administration didn't make a phone call to address the attack on the embassy. Based on the testimony that I've read, that's simply not true... They did it wrong in a bunch of other ways, but indicating that they wouldn't pick up the phone isn't reality.