TexasCHLforum.com

texanjoker wrote:I have been following that. Cracks me up. As I always say, I have issue with the chief / sheriff being able to get political in uniform, but the rest of us cannot per policy. At least the sheriff's are elected so the people can vote as they see fit the next election, but not for the chief. They serve at the will of the council.

I also get sick of all CA cops being lumped into the liberal mess because of these guys.

Yes, but they can express theirs in uniform to the press, and you get to express yours in civies as an individual citizen. There oughta be a law against that.

http://twitchy.com/2013/05/19/civility- ... ped-brain/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://gunssavelives.net/blog/austin-po ... e-it-back/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Here's John Galt's tweets:
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And here's Acevedo's tweets:
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

It appears that Galt got under Acevedo's skin when he accused him of corruption.