Search found 2 matches

by baldeagle
Wed Apr 10, 2013 3:26 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Federal background check "compromise"
Replies: 62
Views: 6554

Re: Federal background check "compromise"

sjfcontrol wrote:
- Provides a legal process for a veteran to contest his/her placement in NICS when there is no basis for barring the right to own a firearm.
What about the rest of us?
I think that provision was motivated by the stories about the VA turning in vets to NICS.
by baldeagle
Wed Apr 10, 2013 9:59 am
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Federal background check "compromise"
Replies: 62
Views: 6554

Re: Federal background check "compromise"

Poldark wrote:I never left the Republican party, they left me ! .

Progressives leftists progress assisted by progressive Republicans :banghead:

Deal Reached.

http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/10/m ... nd-checks/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
the proposal would require background checks for private sales at gun shows and on the Internet, two areas that are currently exempt.
That's dangerous. That means an FTF posting on this forum would require an FFL in the middle. Craigs List, etc. would all require FFLs. So the price of privately selling a firearm, even to a trusted third party, just went up $20. And the bills include a requirement to keep records, which means one step away from a national registry. First you require the FFLs to keep records. Later you require them to hand over those records to the Feds. Voila! A national gun registry.

Return to “Federal background check "compromise"”