I think that provision was motivated by the stories about the VA turning in vets to NICS.sjfcontrol wrote:What about the rest of us?- Provides a legal process for a veteran to contest his/her placement in NICS when there is no basis for barring the right to own a firearm.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Federal background check "compromise"”
- Wed Apr 10, 2013 3:26 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Federal background check "compromise"
- Replies: 62
- Views: 6554
Re: Federal background check "compromise"
- Wed Apr 10, 2013 9:59 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Federal background check "compromise"
- Replies: 62
- Views: 6554
Re: Federal background check "compromise"
Poldark wrote:I never left the Republican party, they left me ! .
Progressives leftists progress assisted by progressive Republicans![]()
Deal Reached.
http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/10/m ... nd-checks/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
That's dangerous. That means an FTF posting on this forum would require an FFL in the middle. Craigs List, etc. would all require FFLs. So the price of privately selling a firearm, even to a trusted third party, just went up $20. And the bills include a requirement to keep records, which means one step away from a national registry. First you require the FFLs to keep records. Later you require them to hand over those records to the Feds. Voila! A national gun registry.the proposal would require background checks for private sales at gun shows and on the Internet, two areas that are currently exempt.