You seem to be missing the main point. Yes, Obama's children are protected by Secret Service, and yes, they should be. But the armed guards at the school his children (and many other hypocritical elites' children) attend are not Secret Service. They are employees of the school.punkndisorderly wrote:It doesn't matter one way or another, at least to me. Either providing for security is a good idea and is worth it, or it isn't. The same goes for the rest of his proposals. Attack or defend on that. Even a evil moron can have a good idea, just as a genius can be wrong on an issue.
The point is, he see's nothing wrong with that yet doesn't think your children should have armed protection. That is hypocrisy at its most obvious, and that will ring true for many, many parents who are currently very worried about their children's future.