Search found 8 matches
- Sun Feb 24, 2013 11:04 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Do NFA items= problems in the future?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 2330
Re: Do NFA items= problems in the future?
If you really are worried about being on "the list" then I would argue we are in dire enough times to not only get suppressors but everything else you will need to prepare. A citizenry that fears their government for the sake of their God given freedoms isn't really free. Besides, the long...
- Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:36 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Workplace Policy with New Law
- Replies: 62
- Views: 9357
Re: Workplace Policy with New Law
By "job site" do you mean property that your employer owns or places where your company has a contract to provide services and/or do business?
- Joe
- Joe
- Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:31 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Anonymously asking company to update weapons policy?
- Replies: 36
- Views: 6467
Re: Anonymously asking company to update weapons policy?
While I don't think asking a company to change their policy is necessarily the route to go, I think there are many ways to go about getting the ball rolling on the subject. - Does your company have an anonymous ethics and compliance hotline? - Do you know anyone in HR or with influence that regularl...
- Fri Sep 16, 2011 9:54 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: The Refinery I work at Still will not revise its policy
- Replies: 18
- Views: 3216
Re: The Refinery I work at Still will not revise its policy
Sorry, but I disagree with the "silent option" here. I think that makes sense in the case of a improperly posted 30.06 sign where you are a patron/visitor but not in the case of this employee policy issue. Improper signage works to your benefit whereas bad policies put forth by employers p...
- Thu Sep 15, 2011 2:44 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Passage of TX Senate Bill 321
- Replies: 73
- Views: 14340
Re: Passage of TX Senate Bill 321
Funny how that "or" actually means something! ;-) I will admit that there are several things in the wording of the law that would tend to make someone not using their "legalise thinking cap" feel that the law only applies to CHL's. Fought that battle a few times already. The spec...
- Thu Sep 15, 2011 1:59 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Dropping Glock versus 1911
- Replies: 52
- Views: 7031
Re: Dropping Glock versus 1911
Was going to leave this alone, but just came back from lunch where a bunch of plain-clothed LEO's were all sporting their fancy 1911's... ;-) The part about dropping guns is a bit puzzling coming from someone who appears to spenda a fair amount of time around firearms, however the fence post quote i...
- Tue Sep 06, 2011 7:31 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Passage of TX Senate Bill 321
- Replies: 73
- Views: 14340
Re: Passage of TX Senate Bill 321
Thanks for the clarification. After posting and reading things over for the meeelionth time I finally came to the same conclusion. So the answer is "B" and the lawyers got it right. That restores my faith in humanity, sort of. So basically the energy companies got what they wanted. One cas...
- Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:57 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Passage of TX Senate Bill 321
- Replies: 73
- Views: 14340
Re: Passage of TX Senate Bill 321
I have read the "Section F" wording more times than I care to count, read many of the discussions about it here, and had our company lawyers weigh in on it and I am still not clear on its purpose. Can someone please help me get my head around this? What is the purpose of "Section F&qu...