What I was trying to say is that 5% would be the maximum possible. The .5% is much more likely as you point out. It would be interesting to see if what a percentage of current or prospective LEOs would be in those classes. Those would be the ones who may have a greater interest in guns and self-protection. Even a 5%, when you do the math on class size, the odds are long that you are going to have even one person in a class with a CHL.Waco1959 wrote:I think you left out a decimal point. .5% is far more likely than 5% for the students and most of that will be in the BS-Criminal Justice majors and male grad students. Most of the grad programs are in fields that tend to attract the "feel safe" crowd.chasfm11 wrote: My point of this is that if the entire sociology department has 5% with CHLs, undergrad and post grad, it isn't going to be a big number.
Her histrionics are much ado about nothing. I wonder if I can audit one of her classes. It would be easy to get an A.
http://www.twu.edu/admissions/programs-majors.asp
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Gunpoint average? Funny or just sad?”
- Sat Jun 06, 2015 8:36 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Gunpoint average? Funny or just sad?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1717
Re: Gunpoint average? Funny or just sad?
- Fri Jun 05, 2015 9:59 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Gunpoint average? Funny or just sad?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1717
Re: Gunpoint average? Funny or just sad?
There are some even more interesting questions. I tried to do some research about the classes that TWU offers in sociology and who is actually teaching them. She is listed as an associate professor which means she probably doesn't get her pick of the subjects that she teaches. They have a 5 year rotation of their different classes so it is not possible to get anything more granular.
But... if she is teaching undergrads, by default about 3/4 of her students (all but seniors, assuming that the class populations are progressing from high school,and are not career path transfers) would be ineligible for a CHL due to age. I wouldn't surprise me to learn that she doesn't even understand that. Remember: most Liberals are not big on facts when they turn their emotions loose.
Denton County is one of the high growth areas for CHL but even in the general population, it isn't approaching 10%. I cannot imagine that for women who are looking for careers in sociology that they would reach the general population statistical level. And yes, I understand that TWU probably has students from all of Texas and several other States. My point of this is that if the entire sociology department has 5% with CHLs, undergrad and post grad, it isn't going to be a big number.
Her histrionics are much ado about nothing. I wonder if I can audit one of her classes. It would be easy to get an A.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9daaf/9daafdabc81ec5689e7966a090052e9adc29e496" alt="Jester :biggrinjester:"
But... if she is teaching undergrads, by default about 3/4 of her students (all but seniors, assuming that the class populations are progressing from high school,and are not career path transfers) would be ineligible for a CHL due to age. I wouldn't surprise me to learn that she doesn't even understand that. Remember: most Liberals are not big on facts when they turn their emotions loose.
Denton County is one of the high growth areas for CHL but even in the general population, it isn't approaching 10%. I cannot imagine that for women who are looking for careers in sociology that they would reach the general population statistical level. And yes, I understand that TWU probably has students from all of Texas and several other States. My point of this is that if the entire sociology department has 5% with CHLs, undergrad and post grad, it isn't going to be a big number.
Her histrionics are much ado about nothing. I wonder if I can audit one of her classes. It would be easy to get an A.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9daaf/9daafdabc81ec5689e7966a090052e9adc29e496" alt="Jester :biggrinjester:"