My guess is that this is talking about pump action guns, which requires a manual reload and a pull of the trigger. But, then lever actions are still considered unlawful under that rule.C-dub wrote:Doesn't have to completely encircle. It says partially or completely. Even though my put the sporterized stock on the Springfield 1903 by Remington I now have I think it still falls into the definition they have outlined. Does it not?jimlongley wrote:Not ALL, but right up there. My '03-A3 goes, and my Garand and M1 Carbine, but my shotgun's heat shield doesn't completely encircle the barrel (I checked) and I have, and have had, numerous guns that had handguards that did not COMPLETELY encircle the barrel.C-dub wrote:This part gets me too. Wouldn't it ban ALL rifles and shotguns because of the red parts? Even my 1903 Springfield has wood that partially encircles the barrel so I can hold it with my non-trigger hand and not be burned.jimlongley wrote:“a shroud attached to the barrel, or that partially or completely encircles the barrel, allowing the bearer to hold the firearm with the non trigger hand without being burned, but excluding a slide that encloses the barrel.” Somehow that cosmetic addition makes a gun an assault weapon.
Would include most rifles and many shotguns in the definition.
Sheer stupidity.
And what is a slide that encloses the barrel that is excluded? Is that free floating rails?
Makes me wonder just how big a separation would be necessary to say that a handguard did not COMPLETELY encircle the barrel, 50%, 75%, 99%?
Search found 1 match
Return to “Oregon drafting draconian AWB”
- Tue Feb 26, 2013 11:00 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Oregon drafting draconian AWB
- Replies: 30
- Views: 1932