The only time that one can rely on a LEO for protection is IF that person is a LEO; otherwise, a LEO is a respondent to an act that has been committed.anygunanywhere wrote: I do not find it hard to make that connection. We are responsible for our own protection and I can think of very few here who rely on LEO for protection. We do rely on our own abilitites. Employers who force their beliefs on their employees and disarm them with strong armed extortion like tactics should themselves suffer the consequences if their employees are injured by their direct demands.
Aygunanywhere
Search found 1 match
Return to “Property rights vs. gun rights re: parking lot law”
- Tue Oct 21, 2008 5:53 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Property rights vs. gun rights re: parking lot law
- Replies: 51
- Views: 4900