You do have to take into account that most of the media in the area shaping this battle is left leaning, anti-gun. The Statesman seems to be pushing it more than anyone in the news, and their reporters seem very biased and ignorant to much of the laws they're writing about.
And in defense of the gun owners contributing to the report: I have a suspicion that they may be putting things in there they know won't pass muster, but will more than likely shut up the anti-gun nuts for the time being, all well knowing they'll be shot down by either lawyers or leg before Aug 1st.
Speaking of, how is legislature supposed to approve or deny campus policies if they aren't in session between now and when they enact the law August 1st of 2016?
Search found 3 matches
Return to “UT Campus Carry - Surprise!!”
- Fri Dec 11, 2015 12:51 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: UT Campus Carry - Surprise!!
- Replies: 84
- Views: 13734
- Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:26 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: UT Campus Carry - Surprise!!
- Replies: 84
- Views: 13734
Re: UT Campus Carry - Surprise!!
See my post from the previous page.ELB wrote:This is nuts. Does the law really allow the university regulate how a legally-possessed firearm is carried? I was thinking it was limited to "where."TXBO wrote:"Semi automatic handguns must be carried without a chambered round Of ammunition".
This is interesting:Surprisingly UT Is ahead of the military on this one, at least in my experience.The report goes on to note how requiring gun owners to un-holster and store their guns "multiplies the danger of an accidental discharge" ...
I really couldn't read the rest of it because the Chron seems to have an autoplay add followed by a video report, and it just eats my old computer alive -- I can't stop it, and it gums up all the other processing. Does anyone have a link directly to the UT campus carry rules document?
Or,
http://media.cmgdigital.com/shared/news ... Report.pdf
- Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:47 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: UT Campus Carry - Surprise!!
- Replies: 84
- Views: 13734
Re: UT Campus Carry - Surprise!!
http://media.cmgdigital.com/shared/news ... Report.pdf
Excerpt from page 9 defining rules:
I thought government entities weren't legally capable of posting a 30.06 notice? Are they errant in publishing this in their findings?
Excerpt from page 9 defining rules:
Second, TGC § 411.2031(d-1) requires the university to
give “effective notice under Section 30.06, Penal Code,
with respect to any portion of a premises on which license
holders may not carry.” TPC § 30.06 in turn provides that
notice may be given by oral or written communication.
Written communication may take either of two forms. It
may be given individually on a card or document or more
generally through posted signage. Either way, TPC § 30.06
prescribes the precise language the written notice must
contain:
“Pursuant to Section 30.06, Penal Code
(trespass by license holder with a concealed
handgun), a person licensed under Subchapter H,
Chapter 411, Government Code (handgun licensing
law), may not enter this property with
a concealed handgun.” TPC § 30.06(c)(3)(A).
For posted signs, this language must appear in both
English and Spanish, in block letters at least one inch
high. The Working Group did a mock-up of this statutorilymandated
signage and determined that these signs will
have to be at least two feet by three feet in dimension.
I thought government entities weren't legally capable of posting a 30.06 notice? Are they errant in publishing this in their findings?