Search found 1 match

Return to “Hearing Protection Act of 2017”

by SQLGeek
Thu Oct 05, 2017 10:21 am
Forum: Federal
Topic: Hearing Protection Act of 2017
Replies: 148
Views: 52421

Re: Hearing Protection Act of 2017

srothstein wrote:
bblhd672 wrote: :banghead: :banghead: Because every knowledgeable person in the world knows the results would have been no different if the shooter had been using suppressors.
When I had this discussion with a co-worker, he insisted it would have made a difference. I pointed out that no one realized it was gunshots at first, thinking it was pyrotechnics from the show instead. Another friend and I tried to explain how a suppressor worked and what difference it made. We got nowhere and the co-worker still opposes removing any restrictions on suppressors because it might have made a difference in Vegas if the shooter had used one.

Care to guess who my coworker voted for in the last presidential election?
As I'm sure you've pointed out, he had legally purchased a multitude of weapons over the past year. If he had wanted a suppressor, he would have used one.

Return to “Hearing Protection Act of 2017”