Frankly, I am not sure why the Supreme Court granted this one Cert. and not some other, more expansive cases. But I am by no means a legal scholar.OldCannon wrote:\
I know folks will discuss the finer points until the cows come home, but as an FFL, this changes nothing from my perspective. Frankly, I see no reason why this rose to the level of a Supreme Court decision.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “buying guns for someone else”
- Mon Jun 16, 2014 9:08 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: buying guns for someone else
- Replies: 68
- Views: 7755
Re: buying guns for someone else
- Mon Jun 16, 2014 9:07 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: buying guns for someone else
- Replies: 68
- Views: 7755
Re: buying guns for someone else
I wonder how she explains the legality of private transactions then? Actually, that's a question better left unasked.sjfcontrol wrote:Nope, no gun registry shenanigans going on thru NICS there... Not a smidgeon!Writing for the majority, Justice Elena Kagan said the federal government's elaborate system of background checks and record-keeping requirements help law enforcement investigate crimes by tracing guns to their buyers. Those provisions would mean little, she said, if a would-be gun buyer could evade them by simply getting another person to buy the gun and fill out the paperwork.
