TexasCHLforum.com

jminn1 wrote:VentMode=ON
I'm Not A Lawyer

But it seems to me, as a citizen, that the CA legislators pulled a high-order bit of chicanery in getting that legislation passed.
The original bill and the end result have NOTHING in common.

How does this sort of crap happen?

BECAUSE WE LET IT.

Wake up call for all.
VendMode=OFF

It's Friday. Have a good weekend and be safe everyone.

I agree completely. That is the second most disturbing part of this bill IMO. The first part is the actual text of the bill itself.

I am curious as to what Moonbeam is going to do if the bill passes and is sent to his desk. He's vetoed more anti-gun legislation than I would have expected.

It looks like some well known anti-gun legislators in CA gutted and amended a dead assembly bill from 2013 and turned it into this. The kicker is this was amended in the state senate.

It's almost as if they had it ready to go and jumped at the opportunity to introduce it after the Isla Vista murders...which they keep calling a mass shooting. Somehow 2 people murdered with a gun now qualifies as a mass shooting?

http://www.latimes.com/local/political/ ... story.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

A thread on Cal Guns with more info:

http://calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=939416" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The text of the bill:

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces ... 0140AB1014" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

There's a lot to the bill worth reading but this part stands out and it disturbs me to no end. This is ripe for abuse.

18102.
(a) The magistrate, before issuing the gun violence restraining order, may examine on oath, the person seeking the order and any witnesses the person produces, and shall take his or her affidavit or affidavits in writing, and cause the affidavit or affidavits to be subscribed by the parties making them.

(7) Evidence of recent acquisition of firearms or other deadly weapons.