I think it was the lack of unlicensed carry sign. I'm sure that would've done it.Scott in Houston wrote:They needed to post a red 51% sign ... that would have done it. Oh... and a gun buster too. They were just too light on signs!SQLGeek wrote:It's funny, I noticed it right away and then I saw your comment after the fact. Maybe the BG figured it didn't apply to him since he clearly did not have a handgun.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “City of Houston Video... surviving an 'active shooter'...”
- Fri Jul 27, 2012 9:21 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: City of Houston Video... surviving an 'active shooter'...
- Replies: 35
- Views: 7163
Re: City of Houston Video... surviving an 'active shooter'..
- Thu Jul 26, 2012 4:06 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: City of Houston Video... surviving an 'active shooter'...
- Replies: 35
- Views: 7163
Re: City of Houston Video... surviving an 'active shooter'..
It's funny, I noticed it right away and then I saw your comment after the fact. Maybe the BG figured it didn't apply to him since he clearly did not have a handgun.
- Thu Jul 26, 2012 4:00 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: City of Houston Video... surviving an 'active shooter'...
- Replies: 35
- Views: 7163
Re: City of Houston Video... surviving an 'active shooter'..
Fight back with improvised weapons. Yes, because I'd prefer improvised over actual.
The scene at 0:56 was more than a little ironic don't you think?
The scene at 0:56 was more than a little ironic don't you think?