Search found 2 matches

by SQLGeek
Thu May 13, 2010 1:28 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: An argument against 30.06
Replies: 82
Views: 16006

Re: An argument against 30.06

frazzled wrote:Citizens have never had rights to be armed on government property.
That is not true at the local, state (Texas) and in some cases, Federal level.
by SQLGeek
Thu May 13, 2010 12:41 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: An argument against 30.06
Replies: 82
Views: 16006

Re: An argument against 30.06

frazzled wrote: The right against trespass pre-exists your right to firearms by nearly 1,000 years.
Unless you are an LEO, then not so much. All he's saying is that he would like the same unfettered right to carry a gun that LEOs already have.

Embalmo, from what I have seen and experienced, LE applicant background checks are more rigorous and the standards higher than a CHL background check.

Return to “An argument against 30.06”