A Machine Gun? That is a silly thing to charge him with.... he has no such thing. Why would the DA charge hims with something that factually cant be true."The four-count indictment, returned yesterday, alleges Ajay Dhingra possessed a machine gun, made two materially false statements in the acquisition of two firearms and unlawfully possessed a firearm after having been adjudicated as a mental defective or who had been committed to a mental institution,"
Mr prosecutor, have you heard of the The National Firearms Act, 26 U.S.C. 5845(b)?
ADA: Yes
Mr prosecutor, have read the The National Firearms Act, 26 U.S.C. 5845(b)?
ADA: Yes
Mr Prosecutor, were there any words in the The National Firearms Act, 26 U.S.C. 5845(b) that you did not understand?
ADA: No
Mr Prosecutor do you agree that the National Firearms Act, 26 U.S.C. 5845(b), defines a machine gun as; to include any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger?
ADA Yes.
Mr Prosecutor you have charged my client with possessing a machine gun...(pointing to the evidence pile) would you please point out the machine gun you claim my client had?
ADA points to the semi auto rifle.
Mr prosecutor that is a semi auto rifle, not a machine gun..
ADA: But it looks like one
Mr prosecutor that is a semi auto rifle, not a machine gun..
ADA: But it sounds like one
Mr prosecutor that is a semi auto rifle, not a machine gun.. I have 1,236 fire arms experts, 983 of which are US Federal government fire arm experts that will clearly testify the rifle in evidence is not, by the governments own definition a machine gun, would you care to recant or modify your statement on this issue?
ADA: ......ahhh but it is black, scary and looks like one