TexasCHLforum.com

speedsix wrote:...to an old, fat, ex-training officer whose trainees are all safely retired...that IS a lot...times are gettin' rough out there...

Touché

speedsix wrote:... http://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press- ... ed-in-2010" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
... http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/leoka/leoka-2010" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Thanks for the cite
ONE IS TOO MANY....

“Of the 56 victim officers, Seven victim officers had their weapons stolen; seven officers were killed with their own weapons”
So of those covered in this report, 12.5% were killed with their duty weapon. More than I would have thought, less then I would classify as “allot”

ONE IS TOO MANY....
No LEO in the commission of his lawful duties should be shot and killed, period..

seamusTX wrote:

gigag04 wrote:Alot?

I don't understand your question.

Are two officers killed or injured with their own weapon too many, or not a great deal? This kind of thing happens several times a year.

- Jim

I think the point is XXX number of LEO’s in TX divided by x number shot with their duty side arm DOES NOT equal allot. In anyone’s common math.

ONE is to many, but several each year is not allot.