TexasCHLforum.com

Oh can of worms, how do I open thee..

IF the CHL process was used to simply identify trained, legal, citizens who may then go about daily life uncontested carrying their chosen self defense weapon, having proven there legality and training… The CHL process would be welcome and productive.

BUT, added into the CHL process and associated laws (which restrict 2A) we have a host of rules and laws about where that licensed person cannot carry, things we cannot do, punishment to them if they violate these restrictions, things they can be charged with, but they will have a legal point of defense to argue later in court..

Then we have the whole 30-06…
I whole heartedly disagree with the way it is implemented.
I do agree that a person who owns privet property should be able to restrict another from coming on their property armed… UNLESS that person opens that property up to the public. I think they should LOOSE that entitlement the second they open the property to the public. Yes I know, my beliefs and opinions are not supported by current law, and many folks way of thinking.. I’m ok with that… it does not change my mind.
You want to restrict who comes on your privet property? Keep it privet.