Search found 3 matches

by G26ster
Thu Jan 26, 2017 6:49 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Convince me that constitutional carry is a good thing
Replies: 257
Views: 58875

Re: Convince me that constitutional carry is a good thing

AJSully421 wrote:
Soccerdad1995 wrote:
Flightmare wrote:
G26ster wrote:Why is this called "Constitutional Carry?" Does that mean anyone including those convicted of violent crimes should have the right to carry? I hope not. It doesn't matter anyway, as that is exactly what the great unwashed mass of voters will believe just from the name alone. I believe it's a terrible name.
This is why Charles prefers to simply call it "unlicensed carry".
"Unlicensed carry" has a ring of doing something wrong, at least to me. At a minimum, it presumes that the normative state is to require a license for the exercise of this right.

Couldn't we just call it a "Right to Carry" bill?
Nationally, the key phrase has been well established. "Constitutional Carry" is the phrase, like it or not.
Well I'm going to establish a new brand of coffee "nationwide." I'm calling it "Sludge." The public is going to love it. :thumbsup:
by G26ster
Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:21 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Convince me that constitutional carry is a good thing
Replies: 257
Views: 58875

Re: Convince me that constitutional carry is a good thing

Why is this called "Constitutional Carry?" Does that mean anyone including those convicted of violent crimes should have the right to carry? I hope not. It doesn't matter anyway, as that is exactly what the great unwashed mass of voters will believe just from the name alone. I believe it's a terrible name.
by G26ster
Wed Nov 16, 2016 1:35 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Convince me that constitutional carry is a good thing
Replies: 257
Views: 58875

Re: Convince me that constitutional carry is a good thing

Does constitutional carry mean that career criminals/felons maintain the right to keep and bear arms? No penalty for a career criminal carrying, but not committing a crime at the time? If not, how can it be called constitutional carry? If so, criminals already carry, we know that, but do we want them to?

Return to “Convince me that constitutional carry is a good thing”