Thanks again Keith. I'll go with the, "could be released pending charges" as the answer. I'm still not sure it's right for the state to ask about arrests, if no charges have been filed as of the time of application. If the arrest is important, then the statute should say so. BTW, I'm not asking for me, as I have never been arrested and have had my CHL for several years.Keith B wrote: Unless you have been charged, then I doubt the arrest is going to show on a background check (don't know that for a fact though.) You could be released pending charges and you can be in limbo for awhile unitl the DA decides what they want to do. best bet is if you have been arrested for a Class B or above (or 42.01 violation), but no disposition on the case, you need to get it cleared up and either dropped or found not guilty before you apply for a CHL.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “Question About An Old Arrest And Eligibility: Update”
- Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:23 pm
- Forum: Site Announcements, Questions & Suggestions
- Topic: Question About An Old Arrest And Eligibility: Update
- Replies: 29
- Views: 10449
Re: Question About An Old Arrest And Eligibility: Update
- Thu Mar 29, 2012 1:55 pm
- Forum: Site Announcements, Questions & Suggestions
- Topic: Question About An Old Arrest And Eligibility: Update
- Replies: 29
- Views: 10449
Re: Question About An Old Arrest And Eligibility
Thanks Keith. I agree with the "charged," but being arrested in itself does not always mean charged. But, I did use the word "convictions" when I should have used "charged." I'm still left with wondering what the relevance of being arrested is.Keith B wrote:Actually, unless the case has been dismissed or a verdict handed down, then they can prohibit you from getting your license if you have a pending Class B or higher, or an offense under TPC 42.01 or equivalent.G26ster wrote:
Thanks for your response. A second part of the question would be, "what do arrests have to do with it?" Can you be denied a CHL due to arrests, with no convictions? If not, then it seems asking about convictions would be more relevant.
I always thought you were "innocent until proven guilty in court" Still curious.
GC §411.172. ELIGIBILITY wrote: (4) is not charged with the commission of a Class A or Class B misdemeanor or equivalent offense, or of an offense under Section 42.01, Penal Code, or equivalent offense, or of a felony under an information or indictment;
- Thu Mar 29, 2012 12:16 pm
- Forum: Site Announcements, Questions & Suggestions
- Topic: Question About An Old Arrest And Eligibility: Update
- Replies: 29
- Views: 10449
Re: Question About An Old Arrest And Eligibility
Thanks for your response. A second part of the question would be, "what do arrests have to do with it?" Can you be denied a CHL due to arrests, with no convictions? If not, then it seems asking about convictions would be more relevant.speedsix wrote:G26ster wrote:I'm just curious how the State of Texas can even ask if you been arrested. I know I couldn't ask that question of a job applicant. I could ask about convictions, but not arrests. Can someone "in the know" explain?
...a concealed carry license is considered a "benefit"...normal privacy does not apply...as part of the application, we sign away normal privacy rights to obtain that benefit...
I always thought you were "innocent until proven guilty in court" Still curious.
- Mon Feb 27, 2012 7:06 pm
- Forum: Site Announcements, Questions & Suggestions
- Topic: Question About An Old Arrest And Eligibility: Update
- Replies: 29
- Views: 10449
Re: Question About An Old Arrest And Eligibility
I'm just curious how the State of Texas can even ask if you been arrested. I know I couldn't ask that question of a job applicant. I could ask about convictions, but not arrests. Can someone "in the know" explain?