I don't want to give the wrong impression about my responses, btw. I think this approach has merit, but without it getting House and Senate sponsorship, and without an executive with a spine, this can't see the light of day.
Moreover, as I've implied before, the left states will sniff this out as an erosion of whatever control they still have, and will fight it tooth-and nail. If we take the senate and POTUS this Nov, you may only have a two year window to get it passed (just like the Dems did with Obamacare).
Search found 3 matches
Return to “2nd Amendment misunderstood?”
- Thu Aug 02, 2012 1:21 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: 2nd Amendment misunderstood?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 4296
- Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:11 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: 2nd Amendment misunderstood?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 4296
Re: 2nd Amendment misunderstood?
You're thinking at the Texas level too much. Federal level, no way. CA and NY wield WAY too much power over bills.C-dub wrote:I know it could be possible, but couldn't it also be possible to prevent that from happening within a bill? I don't have the answer, but I do see conservatives paralyzed by fear of the possibility of what the liberals might try. The problem is that we, conservatives, are truly concerned what others think, while liberals don't care.OldCannon wrote:"In light of the passage of the Militia Act, the State of New York has declared that the state has sufficient numbers of police and national guard units for any contingency. New York will not grant additional IDs to non-police or non-National Guard individuals for any reason. Ownership of any weapons, other than specific single-shot rifles and shotguns outlined in the regulations below, is a felony punishable by no less than 20 years in prison."
Anytime somebody proposes a new law, I fantasize what that law will look like after it passes through congress. Most times it looks a lot like hay, after it has passed through a horse.
- Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:00 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: 2nd Amendment misunderstood?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 4296
Re: 2nd Amendment misunderstood?
"In light of the passage of the Militia Act, the State of New York has declared that the state has sufficient numbers of police and national guard units for any contingency. New York will not grant additional IDs to non-police or non-National Guard individuals for any reason. Ownership of any weapons, other than specific single-shot rifles and shotguns outlined in the regulations below, is a felony punishable by no less than 20 years in prison."
Anytime somebody proposes a new law, I fantasize what that law will look like after it passes through congress. Most times it looks a lot like hay, after it has passed through a horse.
Anytime somebody proposes a new law, I fantasize what that law will look like after it passes through congress. Most times it looks a lot like hay, after it has passed through a horse.