True, and it was silly, but Desperado was really meant to be a parody of a revenge themed movie. And, of course, EVERY cowboy movie made since TV started did that whole "sling the bullet" maneuver. I once read that budgets were so low in some of those old TV shows that there weren't even blanks, so the actors had to fake recoil, but since there was no smoke, they also waved the gun forward and back quickly to emphasize their shooting.Skiprr wrote:Here’s one I forgot about: “cowboying,” as in flinging a handgun forward as you shoot to, I suppose, help the bullet along by throwing it out of the barrel. It’s most commonly seen when the actor is using two handguns and firing them in an alternating, reciprocating action, a la Antonio Banderas in the big shoot-’em-up bar scene in Desperado.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “What are your movie pet peeves re: guns?”
- Mon Jul 04, 2011 4:47 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: What are your movie pet peeves re: guns?
- Replies: 116
- Views: 15307
Re: What are your movie pet peeves re: guns?
- Mon Jul 04, 2011 10:22 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: What are your movie pet peeves re: guns?
- Replies: 116
- Views: 15307
Re: What are your movie pet peeves re: guns?
One thing that was odd to me. There's a scene in The Other Guys where Mark Wahlberg points his Glock at Will Ferrel's character. I could immediately tell that the Glock barrel was a "blank adapter". I'm getting too smart to watch movies with guns in 'em now
- Mon Jun 27, 2011 8:31 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: What are your movie pet peeves re: guns?
- Replies: 116
- Views: 15307
Re: What are your movie pet peeves re: guns?
Yup. Self-contained oxidizers We need to have the Mythbusters team do something to prove this :)Steve133 wrote:I agree. Propellants used in ammunition contain an agent that produces oxygen when heated. My (admittedly somewhat dim) memories of long-ago basic chemistry and thermodynamics courses tell me that potassium nitrate serves this purpose in black powder; I've either forgotten or never knew what compound is used in smokeless powder. Point being that the energy supplied to ignite the propellant in the first place is also enough to start a reaction in the oxidizer that produces enough oxygen to support combustion of the other propellant components. So yeah, counterintuitive as it might seem, you can totally fire a gun in a vacuum.rm9792 wrote:What would the lack of oxygen matter? Should still fire.i8godzilla wrote:My biggest pet peeve--as has already been mentioned--is the lack of a need to reload.
There is a scene in Armageddon where the shuttle commander pulls out a gun. Although they were inside of the spacecraft, I would have liked to have seen how they would have portrayed the gun firing in zero gravity without oxygen.
The part that they usually leave out is that Newton's 3rd Law is a little more relevant when you're not rooted in place by gravity....
- Wed Jun 22, 2011 9:31 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: What are your movie pet peeves re: guns?
- Replies: 116
- Views: 15307
Re: What are your movie pet peeves re: guns?
Biggest peeve: The Glock 7. Hands down.
Why? Because the false perception/fear of "plastic guns" (or porcelain guns) that can evade security is so ubiquitous that it was even discussed during the Heller trial at the Supreme Court, even though nothing like one exists. Sadly, it is the lie that has become truth.
Why? Because the false perception/fear of "plastic guns" (or porcelain guns) that can evade security is so ubiquitous that it was even discussed during the Heller trial at the Supreme Court, even though nothing like one exists. Sadly, it is the lie that has become truth.