Disagree on losing… it's our tax money moving from one entity to another. It's already been paid, but that movement of money would resolve the issue of the improper and now illegal signs on public land.jmorris wrote:338winmag wrote:Think about it, the government is fining the government.RossA wrote:Think of all of the revenue the state is missing by not taking action and collecting those fines from all around the state.
Different levels though, State collecting from City....collecting from us. So either way we lose.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Houston Zoo Reinstalls No Guns Signs”
- Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:15 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Houston Zoo Reinstalls No Guns Signs
- Replies: 131
- Views: 32608
Re: Houston Zoo Reinstalls No Guns Signs
- Wed Jan 06, 2016 8:28 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Houston Zoo Reinstalls No Guns Signs
- Replies: 131
- Views: 32608
Re: Houston Zoo Reinstalls No Guns Signs
Another note that nobody discusses or really knows is the word "militia" in the 2A…
People today assume it means an organized, somewhat paramilitary group that people signed up for or enlisted with, etc.
It doesn't and it didn't. In their day, that word was clear to them to mean "everybody" or essentially every able-bodied person who could fight. There was no formal militia as we think of it today. It was just 'we the people' who were the militia… everybody.
People today assume it means an organized, somewhat paramilitary group that people signed up for or enlisted with, etc.
It doesn't and it didn't. In their day, that word was clear to them to mean "everybody" or essentially every able-bodied person who could fight. There was no formal militia as we think of it today. It was just 'we the people' who were the militia… everybody.