This is incorrect.Hoosier Daddy wrote:It's notice in the same way a 30.06 sign is notice. No more, no less.RottenApple wrote:As for government offices posting 30.06 signs, there's nothing in the law that says they can't post them, just that it's not enforceable. Of course, if the metal detector goes off and security finds you with a firearm, you may then be told you can't carry there. That would be effective notice under 30.06.
They don't have to allow you in, but it looks like you wouldn't be violating the 30.06 rule if you sneak it in.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Please help clarify my understanding of 30.06”
- Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:03 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Please help clarify my understanding of 30.06
- Replies: 38
- Views: 6464
Re: Please help clarify my understanding of 30.06
- Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:39 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Please help clarify my understanding of 30.06
- Replies: 38
- Views: 6464
Re: Please help clarify my understanding of 30.06
That is awesome!!! Go Florida. I love their gun friendliness.
- Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:37 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Please help clarify my understanding of 30.06
- Replies: 38
- Views: 6464
Re: Please help clarify my understanding of 30.06
First off. Love the screen name. On some forums I go by "Bumpus Hounds".Scott Farkus wrote:RottenApple - THANK YOU!!! That's what I was missing. I will sleep better tonight.
As far as the government offices, I thought they weren't allowed to prohibit CHL holders at all (other than the specified exceptions), not just with a 30.06 sign. You're saying they can give oral notice and it's valid? That doesn't make sense.
Notwithstanding that, is my understanding of "government meeting" correct? As I read the statute, you just can't carry into the meeting itself, not the entire building, right?
To answer you're question, your understanding is correct. They cannot give verbal or print notice in non-Fed government buildings.
As for "meetings" that hasn't been tested in court. I don't think there's a definitive answer yet.