TexasCHLforum.com

jmorris wrote:

Scott in Houston wrote:

Pawpaw wrote:

Scott in Houston wrote:

Pawpaw wrote:Government employees are like lawyers... 99% of them give all the rest a bad name.

Call me jaded, but the percentage has got to be WAY higher than that, when it comes to government employees. I would guess that it is the other way around, 99% give 1% a bad name.

Very carefully, re-read what I wrote. "99% of them give all the rest (in other words 1%) a bad name."

Doh!
My bad.

Well, I hope you'll concede the possibility that both my wife and I are in the 1%.

The fact that you're on this forum already proves it.

Pawpaw wrote:

Scott in Houston wrote:

Pawpaw wrote:Government employees are like lawyers... 99% of them give all the rest a bad name.

Call me jaded, but the percentage has got to be WAY higher than that, when it comes to government employees. I would guess that it is the other way around, 99% give 1% a bad name.

Very carefully, re-read what I wrote. "99% of them give all the rest (in other words 1%) a bad name."

Doh!
My bad.

Pawpaw wrote:Government employees are like lawyers... 99% of them give all the rest a bad name.

Call me jaded, but the percentage has got to be WAY higher than that, when it comes to government employees. I would guess that it is the other way around, 99% give 1% a bad name.

It was my understanding that anyone with a liquor license gets a packet with both signs in it, and then you post accordingly based on your license.
It's possible, that in this case, they were "out of the blue signs" and only sent the red, but come on... really?