Search found 3 matches

by Boxerrider
Thu Jul 22, 2021 8:54 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: 30.06 Ruling Letters
Replies: 229
Views: 88817

Re: 30.06 Ruling Letters

C-dub wrote: Thu Jul 22, 2021 5:46 pm
Boxerrider wrote: Thu Jul 22, 2021 3:36 pm The senate has time to address this now, correct???
They do, but I don't think they can since it wasn't one of the things specified for the Special Session.
Ahh, I forgot about that - topics of a special session are limited to those assigned by the governor, aren't they?
When there really is a session, I do want them to concentrate on the voting bill. Another part of me, however, wants him to stack things up while the dems are playing hookey.
by Boxerrider
Thu Jul 22, 2021 3:36 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: 30.06 Ruling Letters
Replies: 229
Views: 88817

Re: 30.06 Ruling Letters

The senate has time to address this now, correct???
by Boxerrider
Fri Jan 18, 2019 7:25 am
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: 30.06 Ruling Letters
Replies: 229
Views: 88817

Re: 30.06 Ruling Letters

C-dub wrote: Fri Jan 18, 2019 2:24 am
Flightmare wrote: Fri Jan 18, 2019 1:25 am
RicoTX wrote: Fri Jan 18, 2019 1:09 am I think this is good news.
However, why are the fines so low?
Why threaten with huge fines if the State is not going to use them?
The judge ruled that there was only evidence of violations during 6 days.
This sounds like a weak judge to me doing everything he or she can to lessen the penalty on the city and are only ruling against them because they can’t find a way around the law. I wonder if they really expected someone to try and gain entry every day they were open and document that.
I bet there will be people trying to carry there today!
While I would have liked to seen the city of Austin hammered, I can see this as a step in the right direction. Now let's see some action on those complaints that have been sitting on deck.

Return to “30.06 Ruling Letters”