Search found 2 matches

by Glockamolie
Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:50 pm
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: Baretta 92fs
Replies: 23
Views: 2069

txinvestigator wrote:
Glockamolie wrote:
HighVelocity wrote:Does anyone here actually think the 92FS is not a good gun? :???:
I have limited underwhelming experience with one. Here's a good read:

http://www.sightm1911.com/lib/history/true_story_m9.htm
:roll: 20 years ago under rigorous military testing a few EARLY models had slide problems. They fixed it, big deal.
If you read the whole article :???: , you'd see that it wasn't trashing the Beretta. The last two paragraphs:

"After the initial bugs were worked out, the M9 pistol developed into a reliable combat proven weapon. Most current/former military personnel that I have been privileged to speak with while researching this article have stated a general satisfaction with the weapon’s reliability while citing the concerns about the size, weight and caliber that I have mentioned already. It has saved the lives of soldiers, law enforcement officers and civilians alike over the years. It remains today an accurate and reliable weapon suitable for personal defense. Few military sidearms have proven themselves to be as good a weapon as the M9 has turned out to be, despite the gun shop gossip to the contrary.

It remains worthy of our consideration when choosing a weapon. "
by Glockamolie
Sun Jul 30, 2006 9:31 am
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: Baretta 92fs
Replies: 23
Views: 2069

HighVelocity wrote:Does anyone here actually think the 92FS is not a good gun? :???:
I have limited underwhelming experience with one. Here's a good read:

http://www.sightm1911.com/lib/history/true_story_m9.htm

Return to “Baretta 92fs”