SB 838 is most likely dead unless some unexpected parliamentary maneuver get it passed.ClarkLZeuss wrote:I think they are trying to change the law in relation to this, because there is basically a loophole that allows non-CHLs to carry in their cars, but CHLs don't have the same luxury.
You are mostly right. The law states, "a motor vehicle that is owned by the person or under the person's control."Morgan wrote:I BELIEVE that "loaning" it to your passenger is not kosher. I BELIEVE that I read in the motor-carry laws that the vehicle's controller is the one who has to have the gun.
This incident illustrates that this law is not a reliable get-out-of-jail card.
- Jim