The 4th Amendment prevent illegally obtained evidence from being used in a trial. It doesn't stop the seizure in the first place.txinvestigator wrote:Only that pesky old 4th and 5th amendment and the Texas Constitution and Code of Criminal Procedure.
The police took James Walton's weapon twice.txinvestigator wrote:If there is doubt as to the weapon used, or concern that evidence might go "missing" the police can seize potential evidence.
I can think of no circumstance where they would be justified in seizing all of your weapons in a self-defense shooting, minus other serious violations like you being a felon, having illegal weapons etc.
I would be interested of proof of such occurring.
When you have a burglar dead from a shotgun wound and a homeowner who called 911 to report the shooting, I don't see the need to confiscate the shotgun.
Here's one example I could find: http://www.jpfo.org/alert20040901.htm. I've read about other cases over the years. I don't have them available now.
- Jim