I own stock in several companies. I have never been given an opportunity to vote on company HR policies. If I don't like the company's policies, I can vote for a different BoD that can replace the CEO, but that's after the fact. The CEO is the CEO and exercises the authority of that office until replaced.WildBill wrote:The CEO of a corporation is responsible to the stockholders [at least that is the theory] and the board of directors. He or she can not make or change policy without their approval.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Boycotting 30.06 Businesses vs. Employee Policy”
- Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:44 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Boycotting 30.06 Businesses vs. Employee Policy
- Replies: 51
- Views: 5046
Re: Boycotting 30.06 Businesses vs. Employee Policy
- Mon Apr 25, 2011 1:31 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Boycotting 30.06 Businesses vs. Employee Policy
- Replies: 51
- Views: 5046
Re: Boycotting 30.06 Businesses vs. Employee Policy
The CEO is responsible. Whether the company is private or public, the buck stops there.WildBill wrote:One thing that I would like to point out about businesses posting 30.06 signs, gun buster signs or having "anti-gun" policies is that most of the companies that people work for and do business with are corporations. They are not independent businesses owned by individuals , so there is no one person who has the sole responsibility or discretion to establish company policies towards firearms.