TexasCHLforum.com

something about metal shavings from barrel locking lugs
Solo
pros and cons review
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The Annoyed Man wrote:

RPB wrote:
Kahr PM9 versus Kahr CM9 article
(But, don't confuse a CM9 with a CW9, which is larger and imho, not as good ... I had a CW40 and almost swore to never buy another Kahr ... I'm not a CW fan ... IMHO the W stands for worthless )
CM9 differs from the PM9 in 6 different ways. (but see the link in my above post re: shopping PM9)
http://www.gunsamerica.com/blog/the-kahr-cm-9/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Beg to disagree. My wife's CW9 has been problem free, easy to shoot, and functions reliably......and it carries very nicely in either holster or purse. I am led to understand that some of the older Kahrs, particularly in .40 cal, were prone to breakage. That appears not to be the case nowadays. I own a PM9 and a CW45, and they're both good guns.

yup mine was one of the old .40s it was a lemon, I really haven't heard anything but good reports on newer/all other models just my "feelings" got bent on a bad experience, but they've made up for it now I s'pose

Prior statement withdrawn ... jury will please disregard ...

the Pm and CM are smaller than the CW though.

SATX-Scrub wrote:I love my single stack 9mm P290. Once I got used to the DA long pull it was a breeze. Its dead on accurate (laser if you want it) and it tucks nicely in my Crossbreed. I like the hammer fire too. Just a hair bigger than the P238 but you get the more affordable ammo choice. The extra 4 oz help with any recoil. Spent casings land on the far right of center too!

It fits in my small hands too!

That's another one I forgot
Sig Sauer P290 w/ laser

http://www.google.com/products/catalog? ... CDkQ8wIwAg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Kahr PM9 versus Kahr CM9 article
(But, don't confuse a CM9 with a CW9, which is larger and imho, not as good ... I had a CW40 and almost swore to never buy another Kahr ... I'm not a CW fan ... IMHO the W stands for worthless )
CM9 differs from the PM9 in 6 different ways. (but see the link in my above post re: shopping PM9)
http://www.gunsamerica.com/blog/the-kahr-cm-9/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I forgot the new Ruger LC9

Ruger LC9 has a mag safety to prevent getting shot with an "unloaded gun"
(A disadvantage if one is chambered and reloading in a firefight and you can't use that round if you dropped the mag and you have to wait until you can pick it up to insert it and fire)
Ruger LC9 vs Kahr CM9
[youtube][/youtube]

Kahr PM9 VS Kel Tec PF9,
[youtube][/youtube]

Springfield XD9

too large for me to conceal on my body.

Since you already have a S&W 9mm, I'd hate to see you go to .380 just based on size/weight/concealablity
Suggestion:
Looked at any thin/single Stack compact/subcompact 9mms?
a Few Options
Kahr PM9 http://www.google.com/search?q=kahr+pm9 ... 24&bih=636" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Walther PPS
KelTec PF9 (I have one, light weight enough to wear with pajama bottoms elastic)
BERSA Ultra Compact 9
Taurus Millenium Pro 111BP
Taurus PT709 Slim/PT890 or whatever it is now (I have a 709 Stainless, it's nice, but I'd prefer a PM9)
---------------------
Diamondback DB9 will be a good one someday, ammo picky now ... new on the market, I'm waiting to get one so I can't say get one yet in good conscience