TexasCHLforum.com

sjfcontrol wrote:As I said earlier in this thread to the person who was giving that same information...

Exactly how may Republicans has Obama nominated for the courts? How many do you expect him to?

Who wins?

sjfcontrol wrote:

RPB wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:

lkd wrote: While attractive, the ONLY reason I'd punch the ticker for Romney is because of Supreme Court Nominees. Otherwise, I don't see much difference between him and the guy in the Oval Office right now, and that's pretty sad.

I continue to get the nagging feeling that the MSM is picking our GOP candidate. I'm not trying to be all "tinfoil hat" here, but I keep thinking, "Is this honestly the best the GOP has to offer?"

The Supreme Court is a very valid reason to vote for him in the actual election.

And I agree with your comment/suspicion regarding who exactly is picking the GOP candidates.

Romney put Democrats and Libs in the Mass courts, passing over the Conservatives, Republicans .... so ... that's yet another reason why I'd never vote for him.

Track record ...

Logic flaw example:
He supported Roe vs Wade"because it's been the law for 30 years, since 1973" " onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Length of time" shouldn't be a determinate factor of right or wrong
I mean Blacks were not "people" back in the 1700s, nor in 1857 (Dred Scott v. Sandford ruling by the Supreme Court that held that blacks could not be citizens of the United States) so BY THE SAME REASONING, since that was law longer than Roe vs Wade, that's something his logic supports.

================

Example above used because each issue concerns "Rights" which Supreme Court should uphold, whether it's right to defend life (guns/2A), right to life/liberty/pursuit of ...(personhood) (based on an arbitrary criteria as color or age) etc
Not to start a debate here on any individual issue.

Frankly, I don't care about any of that. He has put (and will put) more republicans into judgeships than Obama has/will. In a two-man race, he still wins.

sjfcontrol wrote:

lkd wrote: While attractive, the ONLY reason I'd punch the ticker for Romney is because of Supreme Court Nominees. Otherwise, I don't see much difference between him and the guy in the Oval Office right now, and that's pretty sad.

I continue to get the nagging feeling that the MSM is picking our GOP candidate. I'm not trying to be all "tinfoil hat" here, but I keep thinking, "Is this honestly the best the GOP has to offer?"

The Supreme Court is a very valid reason to vote for him in the actual election.

And I agree with your comment/suspicion regarding who exactly is picking the GOP candidates.

Oldgringo wrote:

Ameer wrote:

74novaman wrote:

Heartland Patriot wrote: I really don't know what to think anymore...I used to think of most folks who were pro-firearms a certain way, but I guess I was flat-out wrong. My apologies for my mistake.

Why should someone who is pro firearms vote for an anti gun candidate?

I know there are other issues, but you mentioned pro firearms people. Should they vote against their own best interests?

I'd hope, if nothing else that anyone who is pro gun would vote against romney in a primary.

If the Republicans want to win, they need a candidate who is clearly different than Obama.

You may be onto something there with that difference thinghy.

Oldgringo wrote:

apostate wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:Back on point: who knows what Mitt Romney, or any other politician, truly feels about anything until after they are elected?

That's true, and in Romney's case, we're fortunate to have his actions as an elected official (Governor) to guide us.

Is it Romney, Perry, Cain, Bachman, et al, or is it the Republican Party that has failed us? It is the partys' (bofum) resposibility to provide its supporters with a viable candidate and platform to vote "FOR" rather than something/somebody to vote against.

Somebody please help me. I'm still leaning toward voting for ME.

Oldgringo wrote:

RPB wrote:ObamaCare ... allowed an Opt-Out

RomneyCare didn't

Just sayin'

Words are cheap, Obama uses LOTS of them

track records count

Can a leopard change its spots?

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

No, I'll not vote for him if he's the GOP candidate.

I never intentionally vote for anyone who disregards (has a track record for disregarding) rights.

So, who will you vote for? A non vote is a yes vote for the incumbent, Bucko.