TexasCHLforum.com

APynckel wrote:

Carry-a-Kimber wrote:Might wanna read this brief as well. US v Stewart

That's such a weak argument, that because someone makes something within a state, could change the interstate commerce of that item. The government should only be able to regulate the items that only pass the borders of a state, not the otherwise potential trade across state borders.

That's like saying a company MUST produce a good, because if they slacked off, the federal government wouldn't get the taxes it was due. (entitlement on the federal level)