Return to “Response From DPS Regarding Policies When Encountering CHLer”
Apparently!longtooth wrote:Nope & my comment about more important posts was sarcasim. That is about as close to a joke as I ever tell on acount I kant tellem.anygunanywhere wrote:Still no response LT??longtooth wrote:
He probably just missed it for a week. He has answered far more important posts yesterday.
Anygunanywhere
Sounds like obamacare to me. Or any law requiring more than than a handfull of pages to define. There should be a law (Heartland Patriot wrote:('Atlas Shrugged' 1957)Did you really think we want those laws observed? said Dr. Ferris. We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against... We're after power and we mean it... There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Reardon, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with.
) that no law can be passed that contains more words than the Constitution contains.