TexasCHLforum.com

blackmesa wrote:

pcgizzmo wrote:I'm sure during prohibition people said the same things some here are saying. Marijuana is no more harmful and probably less harmful than alcohol.

Being shot with a 30-30 is no more harmful and probably less harmful than being shot with a 30-06.

If marijuana does affect mental state, then the Oregon LEOs have a valid point about carrying a gun under the influence.
On the other hand, if marijuana doesn't affect mental state, pot smokers are wasting their money.

steveincowtown wrote:Uh oh....REEFER MADNESS!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reefer_Madness" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I would take a pot head with a gun over any of the following with a gun:

Methhead
Drunk
Mentally Unstable
Someone on X,E, or other
Someone on Mushrooms
Someone on Coke
Someone on any number of legal prescriptions
A scroned woman (heck hath no fury you know...)
etc., etc.

I am not advocating pot or legalization thereof, but the reailty is that is gets way more negative attention than it desrves. The main problem with not legalizing in the US, is that instead of keeping the cash here at home we are funding the drug wars across the border.

Keith B wrote:

Ameer wrote:viewtopic.php?f=94&t=43827

I thought this argument sounded familiar.

Wow man, I didn't remember that topic. Must be my prescription causing me to forget dude.