Search found 5 matches
Return to “Palin, Lubbock, and a Gun ban?”
- Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:05 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Palin, Lubbock, and a Gun ban?
- Replies: 27
- Views: 4224
Re: Palin, Lubbock, and a Gun ban?
OK -- guess I missed that part. Sorry.
- Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:19 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Palin, Lubbock, and a Gun ban?
- Replies: 27
- Views: 4224
Re: Palin, Lubbock, and a Gun ban?
Trog -- I don't understand your attitude. It seems you know something about who or why this event was posted. How else could you state as a fact that it was "an honest mistake", and by whom was that mistake made?troglodyte wrote:If that is the case then the event was posted as an honest mistake. No agenda. No intent to step on the 2A toes. Far from it. Sometimes mitigation is the lesser of the two evils. If you will pardon the phrase.
If you want to go on a witch hunt. It's your time. It won't undo the past and this info has been passed on so it won't happen again, at least from one of the parties involved, whether it was their fault or not.
I don't intend this as a personal attack, and don't really care one way or the other, but you seem to be defending somebody.
What do you know? (And when did you know it?)
- Wed Jan 26, 2011 8:50 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Palin, Lubbock, and a Gun ban?
- Replies: 27
- Views: 4224
Re: Palin, Lubbock, and a Gun ban?
Another example would be the Texas State Fair. The Fairgrounds are owned by the city, and leased to the people that run the fair. They cannot post 30.06.
- Wed Jan 26, 2011 8:39 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Palin, Lubbock, and a Gun ban?
- Replies: 27
- Views: 4224
Re: Palin, Lubbock, and a Gun ban?
According to Mr. Cotton, this is not correct (by my recollection). An owner of a facility does not have the ability to give a leasee rights that it does not have itself. If the government does not have the right to post, then that right cannot be passed by contract to the leasee.troglodyte wrote:
As to the government owned Civic Center it was leased by a private party, a private school in this case. Control of the facility belongs to the private party. They "own" the building for the duration of the contract. They may decide who may or may not come in. My understanding of the mentioned code is that governments cannot post publically owned and accessible properties when open to the public. The Civic Center is not posted when it is open to the public for public use or events. Private events are that, private and those private entities may do as they please within the terms of the contract. The mentioned code concerns Trespass. If a private party is leasing a public building they can Trespass anyone they would like to.
- Tue Jan 25, 2011 5:55 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Palin, Lubbock, and a Gun ban?
- Replies: 27
- Views: 4224
Re: Palin, Lubbock, and a Gun ban?
Perhaps that 1000-ft no-gun-zone-around-politicians thing is already in effect??lrb111 wrote:Makes me wonder if the stated reasons are bogus, and the real reason was Secret Service related. Maybe she is considered a candidate for national office, and we just haven't been informed yet.
My explanation is much more eloquent than saying the DA is a dummy (remember no abreviations).
