TexasCHLforum.com

chabouk wrote:

Dudley wrote:

pbwalker wrote:I didn't like the decision McCain made - from the get go.

I still can't believe they nominated him. It's like the Republicans wanted to lose.

Right. The problem half of the ticket wasn't Palin.

Darn them for putting someone who would get Republican and Possible Democrat votes, what were they thinking?

Zee wrote:

marksiwel wrote:

Rex B wrote:I'm a Palin fan. I don't think she has said anything yet I disagree with, and usually it's a "Heck Yeah" (or similar).

She needs a little tempering, and needs to expand her horizons and world knowledge.
She isn't going away, and I'm going to vote for here whenever he name is on a ballot.

Here is my "Perfect Candidate"

I want them to be Careful with money, Reduce spending, Reduce National debt. Better with Other Countries. I want them to be big on personal freedom (Gun Rights, Gay Marriage, Abortion, Anti-Censorship) I also dont want anyone who believes that Global Warming is a fraud or that reducing pollution is going to "Cost everyone their jobs", Also I could do without a "Creationist" in office, its just hard to take them seriously. I dont care about his religion I just dont want it affecting Domestic and International policy at all.
republicans run that kind of person, I dont see how they could lose.

If there's such an animal, I'm in. Rep, Dem, Green, no matter.

I guess I better run then, I have no Ivy league education, and dont know anyone in politics, what are my chances?

Rex B wrote:I'm a Palin fan. I don't think she has said anything yet I disagree with, and usually it's a "Heck Yeah" (or similar).

She needs a little tempering, and needs to expand her horizons and world knowledge.
She isn't going away, and I'm going to vote for here whenever he name is on a ballot.

I just dont see what she is doing/saying thats any different from the rest on the Republican party.

Here is my "Perfect Candidate"

Some background in government (Governor, Senator, Big city mayor, or maybe a self made business man)
I want them to be Careful with money, Reduce spending, Reduce National debt. Better with Other Countries. I want them to be big on personal freedom (Gun Rights, Gay Marriage, Abortion, Anti-Censorship) I also dont want anyone who believes that Global Warming is a fraud or that reducing pollution is going to "Cost everyone their jobs", Also I could do without a "Creationist" in office, its just hard to take them seriously. I dont care about his religion I just dont want it affecting Domestic and International policy at all.
republicans run that kind of person, I dont see how they could lose.

I will admit the Media does have it out for her, but come on, she is such an easy target

http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/200911 ... tico/29577" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Palin tells Oprah 2012 run not on radar

In a much anticipated interview with television host Oprah Winfrey that aired Monday, Sarah Palin tamped down speculation that she might run for president in 2012 and took shots at CBS News’ Katie Couric, who conducted a series of interviews with the former Alaska governor in September that seriously damaged Palin’s standing.

Palin’s appearance on Oprah, the first in a media blitz that includes several high profile interviews and an eight-state tour promoting her book, was taped last week and ran just prior to Tuesday’s release of her book “Going Rogue.”

When asked about her plans for 2012, Palin said that a presidential run in two years is “not on my radar screen right now.”

“I am dealing with so many issues that are important to me,” she said. “What I am seeing every day is that you don’t need a title to be important.”

Palin – who resigned as governor of Alaska in June – said that she left office “because I wasn’t going to run for a second term” and that she felt she had already become a “lame duck.”

“My dad’s quote sums it up: ‘She’s not retreating, she’s reloading,’” Palin said of her decision.



Still made about the Katie Couric stuff? Get over former Governor