TexasCHLforum.com

mr1337 wrote:

AndyC wrote:I think the younger Brits have no concept how it used to be, so they passively accept it - but it's the older ones who are vocal about things.

This is how the anti's win. And why we can't ever let that happen here.

It will get worse and worse until the British government has to control the news so the British subjects don’t know that Americans can defend themselves.

It’s just a matter of how bad crime must get before even the young people start demanding the right to defend themselves. It will work out this way because there will be a critical point where the nation can no longer function and the government cannot handle it.

I won’t see it in my lifetime though.

AndyC wrote:And my niece got beaten so badly 3 weeks ago on closing the pub she helps to run over there that she had to have a plate put into her cheek to shore up her eye-socket and cheekbone. Scumbags run wild in that country now; they have no natural predators such as an armed populace to keep them down.

Do those people have a clue what they have been conditioned to accept?

I have always considered the Brits fairly intelligent and during WWII most were not bad warriors.

Eventually I would expect someone to stand up and say you don’t have to be a genius to see this is wrong. Now that they have been all but totally disarmed would they even be able to do anything about it?