Not really. In Texas you can buy and own a gun and have it in your home or carry it in your car without a “FOID”.Hola Gato wrote:Isn't that what a Texas CHL does?VoiceofReason wrote:This amounts to, requiring permission from the government to exercise a constitutional right. It also allows the city or state to maintain a list of citizens that own firearms. In some cases even the types of guns owned.
Search found 2 matches
- Sun Sep 08, 2013 8:20 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Dumb question
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1686
Re: Dumb question
- Sat Sep 07, 2013 10:10 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Dumb question
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1686
Dumb question
Why does the NRA not go after cities and states that require a person to apply for a Firearms Owner Identification (FOID) card?
This amounts to, requiring permission from the government to exercise a constitutional right. It also allows the city or state to maintain a list of citizens that own firearms. In some cases even the types of guns owned.
I think I read that a lawsuit has been filed against DC over all their requirements but has the need for a FOID been abolished anywhere yet?
This amounts to, requiring permission from the government to exercise a constitutional right. It also allows the city or state to maintain a list of citizens that own firearms. In some cases even the types of guns owned.
I think I read that a lawsuit has been filed against DC over all their requirements but has the need for a FOID been abolished anywhere yet?