Beiruty wrote:Federal law would trump local law, All what states can do is not to enforce or corporate with Feds in their investigations.APynckel wrote:http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/20 ... nors-desk/
C'mon Texas! Let's follow suit!Alaska’s HB69, the 2nd Amendment Preservation Act, had it’s third reading in the senate last night, April 10th, and passed with a 17-3 vote. It returned to the house this morning, where they voted 34-5 to concur with the Senate version. The bill will be transmitted to Governor Parnell’s desk.
If Parnell signs it into law, it would nullify a large swath of unconstitutional federal power over the right to keep and bear arms. It begins with the premise that violations of the 2nd Amendment are not law at all
I agree. The best course of action for the states is passive resistance. The federal government does not have enough officers to enforce the federal law in all the states. There will be a few (you know which ones) that will, but if 40 or so make it clear to the feds they will not enforce the gun laws or assist federal officers enforcing the laws, it will flop.