Recoil is not bad because of the weight. It weighs a LOT more than the kel-tec P3AT or the Ruger LCP. The P3AT will hurt my wrist for a week after shooting 50 shots or more. The Nano has more recoil than a Glock 26 but a lot less recoil than the P3AT. It doesn't hurt my wrist. The P3AT weighs 8.3 oz and the Nano weighs 20 oz. The Nano weighs 2 and 1/2 times more than the P3AT.Jumping Frog wrote:One issue I wonder about with the Berreta Nano is how high the bore axis is above the gripping hand. Compare these other subcompact 9mm from Sig, Ruger, and Kimber and see how much lower the bore axis is.
The higher the bore axis, the more the muzzle flip when shooting.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “thinking about buying beretta nano”
- Sun Dec 22, 2013 1:22 pm
- Forum: New to CHL?
- Topic: thinking about buying beretta nano
- Replies: 18
- Views: 3889
Re: thinking about buying beretta nano
- Sun Dec 15, 2013 1:30 am
- Forum: New to CHL?
- Topic: thinking about buying beretta nano
- Replies: 18
- Views: 3889
Re: thinking about buying beretta nano
It is nice little carry gun that will let you pack 9mm power into the size of a .380. Shoots great, accurate, no jams, and the sights are nice. Most pocket pistols have crap sights, but the Nano has decent sights. HOWEVER, keep in mind that it does weigh considerably more than a .380. Also, watch some youtube reviews to see how to field strip it. The field strip procedure is a bit more complicated than a Glock, Ruger LCP, or Kel-Tec P3AT.